Personal Injury

Jeremiah Ross Selected to The National Trial Lawyers "Top-100"

Personal Injury and Civil Rights lawyer, Jeremiah Ross, was selected to the 2025 National Trial Lawyers Top 100. According to The National Trial Lawyers, the Top 100 “is an invitation-only professional organization composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state or region who meet precise qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a thorough multi-phase objective and uniformly applied process which includes peer nominations as well as third-party research. Membership is extended only to a select few of the most qualified attorneys from each state or region who demonstrate superior qualifications of leadership, reputation, influence, stature, and public profile measured by equitable and uniformly applied standards in compliance with state bar and model rule.”


How Passengers injured in an Oregon Crash Can Navigate Insurance to Get Bills Paid

Insurance issues can be complex for people to navigate. They become more complicated when dealing with passengers involved in a car crash or motor vehicle crash. Typically, passengers injured in motor vehicle crashes are focused on getting their medical bills paid first.

Every motor vehicle insurance policy issued in Oregon provides a minimum of $15,000.00 coverage to pay reasonable and necessary crash-related medical bills. Additionally, PIP policies can pay for lost wages and other benefits. The issue with passengers is which insurance policy pays first, and can the injured person use multiple insurance policies?

In Oregon, Personal Injury Protection (PIP) policies can stack, meaning multiple policies may apply to a single accident, especially when medical bills exceed $15,000 within two years. Under ORS 742.526, the law outlines a clear order of which policy pays first when more than one is available:

  1. Primary Coverage: The PIP policy on the vehicle involved in the accident is the first to provide benefits, covering the driver and any passengers. In other words, the vehicle the passenger was riding in will provide coverage first.

  2. Secondary Coverage: If the injured passenger has their own PIP policy (from a different vehicle they own), it can provide additional coverage once the primary policy is exhausted.

  3. Tertiary Coverage: If the injured person lives with a family member who has a PIP policy on another vehicle, that policy may also apply after the first two are maxed out.

This stacking structure ensures that injured parties may access all available coverage options in a tiered manner, offering added financial protection in serious accidents.

Insurance issues are never easy to navigate, and Oregon personal injury lawyers such as Jeremiah Ross work to relieve the stress from dealing with insurers. If you or someone you know has been injured in an Oregon car crash, please call Ross Law at 503.224.1658 for your free personal injury consultation.

Please remember this blog is for informational purposes only. Please do not solely rely on this post and consult with a lawyer and the law. Please remember the law is constantly changing.

Senate Grills Insurance Industry for Putting Profits Over People

When large corporations or government institutions fail everyday people—whether through negligence, bureaucracy, or outright denial of responsibility—Ross Law steps in to fight back. Ross Law and Jeremiah Ross have fought against institutional systemic failures for over a decade. Jeremiah Ross has even been featured in the news for his efforts in fighting insurance corporations’ failures. Now, politicians appear to be attempting to address America’s flawed insurance system that has put people over profits.

In a recent tense and highly charged Senate hearing, the ranking member, Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), and others took aim at top insurance executives from Allstate and State Farm for allegedly cutting disaster-related insurance payouts, leaving countless American families struggling after hurricanes, wildfires, and other catastrophic events.

The Senate Homeland Security subcommittee on disaster management grilled executives from Allstate and State Farm. Senators expressed outrage over what was described as systemic failures to support policyholders during times of crisis.

“We’re talking about moms hauling water because pipes are gone, grandparents sleeping in cars, and families maxing out credit cards because their insurance companies won’t pay out,” Hawley said in his opening remarks.

A Spotlight on Real-Life Struggles

The hearing included powerful testimony from whistleblowers and affected homeowners, including Natalia Migal of Georgia. She recounted her experience with Allstate after a massive oak tree collapsed her home’s roof. While an initial adjuster confirmed a significant loss, Migal claimed the insurance company replaced that adjuster with one who minimized the damage. Ultimately, Allstate offered a payout of less than $100,000, despite her independent assessment valuing the damages at nearly $500,000.

The Insurance Companies Response

Mike Fiato, Allstate’s vice president and chief claims officer, defended the company’s actions, highlighting the insurer’s vast operation—23,000 claims professionals serving 8.4 million claims annually—and its $37 billion payout in 2024, including $4.6 billion for 132 disasters.

Fiato insisted that Allstate covered all structural damages in Migal’s case, stating the main dispute was over cosmetic damage. He also emphasized the industry’s heavy regulation by state insurance commissioners.

State Farm’s Operation Officer Michael Keating, avowed that State Farm was made up of “people” and they make mistakes. Keating stated that State Farm will do what it can to address the mismanaged claims that were discussed at the hearing. He claims that State Farm is focused on the long term interest of the policy holders and not profits.

But Senator Hawley was unconvinced.

“It sounds to me like you’re running a system of institutionalized fraud,” Hawley declared, citing sworn testimony from former Allstate adjusters who alleged they were pressured to alter reports and downplay damage estimates.

A Battle Over Trust

Hawley didn't mince words when challenging Allstate’s corporate ethics. Referring to the company’s motto, he quipped:

“You should change your slogan from ‘Our customers’ worst day needs to be our best’ to ‘Our customers’ worst day is our big profit opportunity.’”

He also criticized Allstate CEO Tom Wilson’s $26 million compensation package in 2024, contrasting it with the struggles of homeowners like Migal still waiting for fair settlements.

Allstate responded with a statement asserting that it serves one in 10 U.S. households and has paid over $20 billion in weather-related claims in the past five years.

Looking Ahead

This hearing signals bi-partisan growing scrutiny of the insurance industry’s role in claims handling—and the accountability gap many Americans feel when navigating claims processes after life-altering events. Insurance Companies in Oregon rarely face accountability, because in Oregon there is not a statute with any real consequences that will address “bad faith” when an insurance company wrongfully denies a claim. Currently Oregon Lawyers, such as Jeremiah Ross, have to rely on court decisions to force Insurance Companies to do the right thing and accept coverage for losses. Oregon’s remedies are not sufficeint to ensure that Insurers do not take advantage of Oregonians in their most vulnerable times. It is hopeful current legislation in the Oregon House passes and that there is Federal Law to prevent insrurers putting profits over people.

If you or someone you know has been subjected to an unfair insurance denial in your automobile crash case or homeowners insurance claim please contact an Oregon insurance lawyer, such as Jeremiah Ross, at 503.224.1658. Ross Law has represented numerous clients in insurance denial claims with great success. However, please remember that each case is different and Jeremiah Ross cannot guarantee any outcome.



Oregonlive Exposes Dangerous Truck Drivers on Oregon's Roads-What if you are hurt by them?

Oregonlive recently exposed a bribery scheme where a commercial truck driving school was paying an independent tester approximately $500 in exchange for a commercial driver’s license. According to Oregonlive, investigators suspected Skyline CDL school in Washington arranged for the Washington tester to be paid in exchange for the tester providing the students a passing grade on their commercial truck driver test regardless of whether the students passed the test or not. This resulted in many inexperienced and knowledgeable students receiving a commercial driver’s license when they did not meet the requirements.

This is a major concern because the scheme permitted numerous unqualified and inexperienced truck drivers to operate 80,000-pound tractor-trailer trucks on Oregon and Washington’s roads. 80% of the drivers who were retested and received suspected fraudulent licenses did not receive a passing grade.

These unqualified drivers can cause accidents that can result in catastrophic injuries, property damage, and even fatalities. When it turns out that the truck driver involved was operating without passing the commercial driver’s license (CDL) test, the legal implications become even more serious. In such cases, victims may have the right to pursue a civil lawsuit not only against the driver but also potentially against the trucking company, the school that arranged for the bribery, or other responsible parties. Here’s what you need to know if you’re considering legal action after an accident caused by an unqualified truck driver.

The Legal Duty of Truck Drivers and Trucking Companies

Truck drivers who operate large commercial vehicles are held to high safety standards under both state and federal regulations. Possessing a valid CDL is not just a formality—it signifies that the driver has undergone proper training and testing to safely operate a commercial vehicle. When a driver operates without passing the commercial driver’s license teste, they breach their legal duty to operate safely and legally.

Trucking companies also have a responsibility to verify that their drivers are properly licensed and qualified. Allowing or negligently failing to check a driver’s credentials can expose the company to liability under the legal doctrine of negligent hiring or retention.

Filing a Civil Lawsuit: Who Can Be Held Liable?

A civil lawsuit after an accident involving an unlicensed truck driver typically seeks compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, property damage, pain and suffering, and other related costs. Depending on the circumstances, you may be able to sue:

  • The unlicensed truck driver: For negligence, recklessness, or illegal operation of a commercial vehicle.

  • The trucking company or employer: If the company knowingly or negligently allowed the driver to operate without a license, or failed to perform proper background checks.

  • Other third parties: Such as the school that arranged for the bribery scheme to pay for the license, or the tester or testing agency.

Proving Negligence in an Unlicensed Driver Case

To succeed in a civil lawsuit, the injured party (plaintiff) must prove that the driver and/or company were negligent. Key evidence may include:

  • The driver’s driving record and proof of license status, and proof the driver took the driver’s test

  • Employment records from the trucking company

  • Police reports and accident investigation findings

  • Witness statements and dashcam footage

The fact that the driver lacked a valid CDL can serve as strong evidence of negligence, but it must be tied directly to the cause of the accident. For example, was the driver unable to control the vehicle due to lack of training? Did their improper maneuver cause the collision?

Potential Damages and Compensation

Victims of accidents involving unlicensed truck drivers may be entitled to compensation for:

  • Current and future medical expenses

  • Lost income and reduced earning capacity

  • Pain and suffering

  • Emotional distress

  • Property damage

  • In a case involving a driver who received a commercial driver’s license through a bribe will certainly expose the defendants to punitive damages to punish egregious misconduct

The presence of an unlicensed driver may increase the likelihood of punitive damages, especially if the trucking company acted with gross negligence or willful disregard for public safety.

Why Legal Representation Matters

Cases involving unlicensed truck drivers can be complex, especially when corporate liability and insurance issues are involved. Trucking companies and their insurers may aggressively defend against claims to minimize payouts. An experienced personal injury attorney , such as Jeremiah Ross, and Ross Law LLC can help investigate the accident, identify all liable parties, negotiate with insurers, and advocate for maximum compensation.

Final Thoughts

An accident caused by an unlicensed truck driver is more than just a traffic violation—it’s a breach of public trust and safety that can have devastating consequences. Victims have legal rights to pursue compensation through a civil lawsuit, and holding negligent drivers and companies accountable is an important step toward justice and safety on the roads.

If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident involving an unlicensed truck driver, consulting with a qualified attorney, such as Jeremiah Ross, at 503.224.1658 can help you understand your legal options and protect your rights.

Need help navigating a truck accident case? Reach out to personal injury lawyer Jeremiah Ross to discuss your commercial vehicle accidents to get started with your claim. Please remember this post is for information purposes only.

What You Need to Know if You Were in Drunk Driving (DUII) Crash in Oregon

Car crashes can be a nightmare. They can be even worse if you were a drunk or intoxicated (DUII) driver hits you. You not only have to deal with your injuries, auto repairs, and insurance issues, but you also have to deal with the law enforcement investigation and prosecution.

Below are things EVERY PERSON involved in a crash caused by a drunk or intoxicated (DUII) driver must know:

Several legal remedies are available to the injured party in a DUII crash. These remedies can be pursued through civil litigation and may include compensatory and punitive damages. Here are the primary remedies available:

1. Compensatory Damages

Compensatory damages are intended to make the injured person "whole" by covering both economic and non-economic losses. They include:

  • Medical Expenses: Compensation for current and future medical bills, rehabilitation costs, and other healthcare-related expenses resulting from the accident.

  • Lost Wages: Reimbursement for lost income due to time off work, as well as future earning potential if the injury results in long-term disability.

  • Property Damage: Coverage for repairs or replacement of the damaged vehicle and any other property damaged in the accident.

  • Pain, Suffering, Embarrassment, Frustration, Inconvenience, Annoyance, etc. : Compensation for physical pain and emotional distress experienced as a result of the accident.

  • Loss of Consortium: Damages awarded to the spouse of the injured party for the loss of companionship, affection, and support.

2. Punitive Damages

In cases where the drunk driver's behavior was particularly egregious, such as driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUII), punitive damages may be awarded. These are intended to punish the wrongdoer and deter similar conduct in the future. Oregon law allows for punitive damages if it is proven that the driver acted with "reckless indifference to the safety of others" or engaged in intentional misconduct. In other words, Oregon law permits people injured by drunk drivers to give teh drunk driver a “legal spanking.”

3. Wrongful Death Damages

If the drunk driving or driving under the influence (DUII) crash results in the death of another, the surviving family members may file a wrongful death lawsuit. Damages in a wrongful death claim may include:

  • Funeral and Burial Expenses: Costs associated with the deceased’s funeral and burial.

  • Loss of Financial Support: Compensation for the loss of the deceased’s income and financial contributions to the family.

  • Loss of Companionship: Compensation for the emotional and relational loss suffered by surviving family members.

  • Emotional Distress: Compensation for the mental anguish, distress, and grief experienced by the surviving family members.

4. Additional Remedies

  • Insurance Claims: Victims can file a claim with the drunk driver's insurance company to recover damages. If the driver's insurance coverage is insufficient, the victim’s own uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage may provide additional compensation.

  • Restitution: In some criminal cases, courts may order the drunk driver to pay restitution to the victim as part of the sentencing process. This is separate from civil damages and aims to compensate for out-of-pocket expenses. There can also be a “compensatory fine” ordered in some limited circumstances.

  • Dram Shop Claims: The injured person or the Estate of a person killed by a DUII driver can also sue a bar, home-owner, or renter if they overserved alcohol to the Drunk Driver. These are called “Dram Shop Cases.” There are some very short timelines involved in Dram Shop cases, and they can be difficult to prove, so please speak with a lawyer if you believe you have a dram shop case.

Filing a Lawsuit

To get any compensation from being involved in a crash caused by a DUII driver, the injured party must file a civil lawsuit against the drunk driver. The process typically involves:

  1. Filing a Complaint: Initiating the lawsuit by filing a legal complaint outlining the facts of the case and the damages sought.

  2. Discovery: Both parties exchange information and evidence related to the accident and injuries.

  3. Settlement Negotiations: Many cases are settled out of court through negotiations between the plaintiff and defendant (or their insurance companies).

  4. Trial: If a settlement is not reached, the case proceeds to trial, where a judge or jury determines liability and awards damages.

Statute of Limitations

In Oregon, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including those arising from car accidents, is generally two years from the date of the accident. For wrongful death claims, the statute of limitations is typically three years from the date of death. If there is a Dram Shop claim involved a formal notice to the person, business, and/or company that you believe over-served you must be served within 180 days of the crash. There may be other time limitations invovlved, so please consult with a DUII Injury Lawyer such as Jeremiah Ross.

Legal Assistance

It is advisable for victims to consult with an experienced personal injury attorney to navigate the legal process, ensure all deadlines are met, and maximize the potential recovery. Ross Law has represented numerous individuals that have been injured by DUII driver’s in Oregon and has achieved incredible results for them. Please call DUII Injury Lawyer Jeremiah Ross at 503.224.1658 if you have any questions regarding your rights and remedies if you were injured by a DUII Driver in Oregon.

Please remember this post is not to be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice. Remember the law is always changing, so please consult with an Oregon Personal Injury lawyer such as Jeremiah Ross and Ross Law LLC rather than relying on this post.

What Do You Do if Your Oregon Auto Insurer Improperly Denies or Delays Your Claim?

In the realm of insurance, the relationship between policyholders and insurance companies is founded on trust. Policyholders expect their insurers to act in good faith, promptly handling claims and providing the coverage promised in their policies. However, what happens when this trust is violated? In Oregon insurance bad faith can leave individuals grappling with denied claims, delayed payments, and unfair treatment.

One area where this often comes to the forefront is when an insurer unlawfully denies or cuts off personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. This usually occurs when there is a “file review” or an “insurance medical exam” by a medical provider that is hired by the insurer and concludes future medical treatment is not necessary or related to the crash. Bad faith conduct also arises when the insurer does not process bills in time or the insurer makes your medical providers jump through unnecessary hoops. This may result in teh providers passing the bills on to you.

What is Insurance Bad Faith?

Insurance bad faith occurs when an insurance company fails to uphold its contractual obligations to its policyholders. This can manifest in various forms, including unjustified claim denials, unreasonable delays in claim processing, inadequate investigations, and deceptive practices. When an insurer acts in bad faith, it undermines the fundamental purpose of insurance, which is to provide financial protection and peace of mind to policyholders in times of need. In Oregon bad faith is written into the law in the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act found in ORS 746.230. The recent court decision in Moody v. Federal Insurance Company, has provided persons insured by an Oregon policy a legal remedy to obtain financial compensation when an insurer violates Oregon’s Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act.

Understanding Personal Injury Protection (PIP) Benefits

Personal Injury Protection (PIP) is a type of coverage that is mandated in some states, including Oregon, as part of auto insurance policies. PIP benefits are designed to provide prompt payment for medical expenses and lost wages resulting from injuries sustained in a car accident, regardless of who was at fault. In Oregon, drivers are required to carry a minimum of $15,000.00 of PIP coverage that pays crash related medical expenses as part of their auto insurance policies.

The Tools Insurance Companies Use to Wrongfully Deny PIP Benefits:

While PIP coverage is intended to provide swift and efficient compensation for accident-related injuries, navigating the claims process can sometimes be fraught with challenges. Insurance companies may engage in tactics aimed at minimizing their financial exposure, including:

  1. Unjustified Claim Denials: Insurers may wrongfully deny valid PIP claims, citing vague policy language or alleging that the injuries are not covered under the policy.

  2. Delaying Claim Processing: Delays in processing PIP claims can exacerbate financial strain for injured individuals who rely on timely reimbursement for medical expenses and lost wages.

  3. Undervaluing Claims: Insurance companies may offer settlements that do not adequately compensate injured parties for their medical costs, lost income, and pain and suffering.

  4. Inadequate Investigations: Insurers have a duty to conduct thorough and fair investigations into PIP claims. However, they may cut corners or overlook crucial evidence to justify denying or undervaluing claims.

Protecting Your Rights

If you believe that your insurer is acting in bad faith regarding your PIP claim, it is essential to take proactive steps to protect your rights:

  1. Document Everything: Keep detailed records of all communication with your insurance company, including emails, letters, and phone calls. Document your medical expenses, treatments, and any correspondence related to your claim.

  2. Know Your Policy: Familiarize yourself with the terms and conditions of your insurance policy, including the extent of your PIP coverage and any limitations or exclusions that may apply.

  3. Seek Legal Guidance: If you encounter difficulties with your PIP claim, consider consulting with an experienced personal injury attorney, such as Jeremiah Ross, who can advocate on your behalf. Ross Law can review your case, negotiate with the insurance company, and, if necessary, pursue legal action to enforce your rights.

Conclusion

Insurance bad faith can have devastating consequences for individuals seeking compensation for injuries sustained in car accidents. Understanding your rights under Oregon's PIP coverage and recognizing the signs of insurer misconduct are crucial steps in safeguarding your interests. By staying informed, documenting your expenses, and seeking legal guidance when needed, you can assert your rights and pursue fair treatment from your insurance company. Remember, you deserve prompt and equitable compensation for your injuries, and insurance bad faith should never stand in the way of justice.

Please remember this blog post is for informational purposes only and is not considered to be legal advice. Please contact an Oregon Personal Injury lawyer such as Jeremiah Ross at 503.224.1658 to discuss your insurance denial. Please remember the law is constanty changing, and this blog post is not updated regularly.

3 Tips for Dealing with Insurance Companies After an Oregon Car Crash

Navigating the aftermath of a car crash can be a daunting task, especially when dealing with insurance companies. Insurance Companies in Oregon are focused on minimizing the amount of money you get, which can leave you feeling overwhelmed and at a disadvantage. However, with the right approach, you can enhance your negotiation skills and secure a fair settlement. Here are three tips to help you effectively negotiate with insurance companies after a car crash.

Document Everything

The importance of thorough documentation cannot be overstated when negotiating with insurance companies. From the moment the accident occurs, start collecting and preserving evidence. This includes gathering information at the scene, such as exchanging contact details with the other party involved, taking pictures of the vehicles and the accident scene, and noting the names and badge numbers of responding law enforcement officers.

Additionally, keep a detailed record of all medical treatments, expenses, and any related receipts. This documentation serves as tangible evidence of the extent of your injuries and the financial losses incurred. Insurance companies often rely on these records when assessing the validity and severity of your claim. By presenting a well-documented case, you strengthen your negotiating position and provide a clear picture of the impact the accident has had on your life.

Also, document when you speak with an insurance company and who you speak with. If you are using the insurance company’s app then screen shot the correspondence to preserve the communication. Preserve all email correspondence with the insurer. This information is invaluable so you don’t feel overwhelmed with trying to remember what you have previously discussed or sent in. It is fairly common for insurers to deny receiving documents or correspondence.

Understand Your Policy and Rights

One common mistake individuals make when negotiating with insurance companies is not fully understanding their insurance policy and legal rights. Take the time to carefully review your policy to know the coverage limits, deductibles, and any exclusions that may apply to your situation. Knowledge is power, and being well-informed allows you to speak confidently during negotiations.

Moreover, familiarize yourself with the laws and regulations governing insurance claims in your jurisdiction. Each state may have different rules regarding fault determination, deadlines for filing claims, and limitations on damages. Armed with this knowledge, you can assert your rights effectively and challenge any unjust denials or lowball offers from the insurance company.

Consider Seeking Professional Assistance

Insurance negotiations can be complex, and the tactics used by insurance adjusters may catch you off guard. Insurers that can make the process more stressful and overwhelming know that you are likely to take a low settlement offer to avoid future stress and frustration. In such cases, enlisting the help of a skilled attorney such as Ross Law LLC experienced in car crash cases can make a significant difference. Personal injury attorneys, such as Jeremiah Ross, specialize in negotiating with insurance companies and can advocate on your behalf to ensure you receive a fair settlement.

Attorneys possess the legal expertise to interpret policy language, assess the true value of your claim, and navigate the complexities of the negotiation process. They can also handle communication with the insurance company, alleviating the stress and burden on you. While legal representation may involve fees, the potential increase in your settlement often outweighs the costs, making it a valuable investment in securing a just outcome. If you have questions regarding your personal injury case call Ross Law at 503.224.1658.

Conclusion

Negotiating with insurance companies after a car crash requires a strategic and well-informed approach. By documenting everything, understanding your policy and rights, and considering professional assistance, you can enhance your chances of reaching a fair settlement. Remember, the key to successful negotiation is being well-prepared and assertive in advocating for your rights and compensation.

Please remember this blog post is for informational purposes only. Please consult with an attorney regarding your Oregon personal injury case to ensure all of your rights and obligations are understood.

What You need to know if You are Injured on an Oregon Amusement Ride or Device

What You need to know if You are Injured on an Oregon Amusement Ride or Device

Amusement parks are cherished destinations where memories are made and thrills are experienced. By adhering to these regulations, amusement parks contribute to a vibrant and secure environment that allows visitors to embark on unforgettable journeys while knowing that their safety is in capable hands. Here is what you need to know if you are injured….